Observational studyPhysiological reports2022
Growth-restricted human fetuses have preserved respiratory sinus arrhythmia but reduced heart rate variability estimates of vagal activity during quiescence.
Observational study in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Kangaroo mother care on autonomic cardiovascular control in foetal-growth-restricted preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Growth-restricted human fetuses have preserved respiratory sinus arrhythmia but reduced heart rate variability estimates of vagal activity during quiescence.Physiological reports · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to assess the association between fetal growth restriction (FGR) and fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) in relation to fetal movements. A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-FECG) allowed beat-to-beat assessments with <5% corrections of RR intervals. FHRV analyses included: Root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD), high frequency power (HF power), and low frequency power (LF power). Fetal movements were categorized by continuous ultrasound scanning. We enrolled 36 singleton pregnant women expecting a small fetus (< the 2.3 percentile of mean weight for gestational age) diagnosed by ultrasound, of whom 25 presented with a birthweight < the 2.3 percentile. Among these, 11 were excluded due to low quality NI-FECG recordings, leaving 14 women with 28 recordings eligible for inclusion in the analyses. The control group consisted of 22 healthy fetuses with birthweights between the 10th and the 90th percentile (average for gestational age [AGA]). In FGR fetuses the HRV response to respiratory activity was comparable to that of AGA fetuses. RMSSD (Ratio 1.54 [95% CI: 1.33; 1.79]) and HF power (Ratio 2.88 [95% CI: 2.12; 3.91]) increased, whereas LF/HF power (Ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.31;0.63]) decreased. However, during fetal quiescence, FGR fetuses differed significantly from AGA fetuses. Compared to AGA fetuses, FGR fetuses displayed lower RMSSD (Ratio 0.77 (95% CI: 0.58; 1.02)) and HF power (Ratio 0.56 (95% CI:0.32; 0.98)). This reduction was associated with the severity of the FGR. In conclusion, FGR fetuses displayed a respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) comparable to AGA fetuses; however, more important, parameters representing cardiac vagal activity were impaired in FGR fetuses during quiescence. RSA may constitute an intrinsic function of the cardiovascular system, which is unaffected by fetal compromise. However, the basic cardiac outflow assessed during fetal quiescence indicates a suppressed cardiac vagal activity in the FGR fetuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.