ArticleHeliyon2022
OAE-based data mining and modeling analysis of adverse events associated with three licensed HPV vaccines.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Ontology of Adverse Events in 2025.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Updated profiling of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events using VAERS case reports.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Investigating the Efficacy of HPV Vaccines in Preventing Cervical Cancer from 2006 to 2018 in the US: A SEER Data Set Analysis.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Three licensed human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines (Cervarix, Gardasil, and Gardasil 9) have been effectively used to prevent infection with oncogenic HPV types; however, many adverse events (AEs) have also been reported following their vaccinations. We assessed AE profiles after receiving the HPV vaccines based on the reported data from Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods: The AE data associated with Cervarix, Gardasil, and Gardasil 9 were retrieved from VAERS database respectively. The combinatorial biomedical statistical methods were used to identify the statistically significant AEs. The Gamma-Poisson Shrinker (GPS) model with gender/age stratification was applied to ascertain the serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the three licensed HPV vaccines. The AE profiles were classified and represented by the Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) for further analysis. Results: As of July 31, 2020, VAERS recorded 3,112, 31,606, and 6,872 AE case reports for Cervarix, Gardasil, and Gardasil 9, respectively. Our Frequentist statistical methods identified 135 Cervarix-enriched AEs, 55 Gardasil-enriched AEs, and 17 Gardasil 9-enriched AEs. Based on the OAE hierarchical classification, these AEs were clustered in the AEs related to behavioral and neurological conditions, immune system, nervous system, and reproductive system. Combined with GPS modeling, 46 unique statistically significant SAEs were founded to be associated with at least one of the three vaccines. Conclusions: Our study led to the better understanding of the AEs associated with the licensed HPV vaccines. The hypotheses on the cause and effect relationships between the HPV vaccination and specific AEs deserve further epidemiological investigations as well as clinical trial studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.