ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
Melanoma lymph node metastases - moving beyond quantity in clinical trial design and contemporary practice.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPP1Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Molecular and Immune Mechanisms Governing Cancer Metastasis, Including Dormancy, Microenvironmental Niches, and Tumor-Specific Programs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Node deposit size index as morphometric marker of intranodal tumour burden in node-positive oral cancer: a hypothesis-generating cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Melanoma in Peru: 1000 patients and 10 years of experience.PloS one · 2025Article
- Nodal melanosis in malignant melanoma: a rare case from the Middle East with comprehensive surgical and histopathological findings.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Delineating the early dissemination mechanisms of acral melanoma by integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Variability of Sentinel Lymph Node Location in Patients with Trunk Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of lymph node metastases is a well-studied prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma. Characterization of melanoma lymph node metastases and their association with survival in multiple, large observational studies has led to recognition of the following high-risk features: quantity of lymph node metastases (number of nodes), size of the nodal tumor deposit (in mm), and extracapsular extension. Despite increasing utilization of these features in the design of randomized clinical trials, in addition to their role in contemporary clinical decision-making, current staging systems lag behind, only accounting for the quantity of lymph nodes with metastases. Herein, we review the prognostic role of melanoma lymph node metastases and their high-risk features, current reporting standards, how such features have been utilized in practice-changing trials, and best practices for future clinical trial design and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.