ArticleJournal of oncology2022
Application of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognosing post-treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer using structured data and machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Multi-regional feature integration on enhanced CT for lymph node metastasis prediction in gastric cancer: a novel radiomics approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Diagnostic artificial intelligence model predicts lymph node status in non-small cell lung cancer using simplified examination.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Radiomics from dual-energy CT-derived iodine maps predict lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Development and comparison of machine learning-based models for predicting heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Increasing transparency in machine learning through bootstrap simulation and shapely additive explanations.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: A more accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) plays a decisive role in the selection of treatment in patients with laryngeal carcinoma (LC). This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) prediction model for predicting LNM in patients with LC. Methods: We collected and retrospectively analysed 4887 LC patients with detailed demographical characteristics including age at diagnosis, race, sex, primary site, histology, number of tumours, T-stage, grade, and tumour size in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2005 to 2015. A correlation analysis of all variables was evaluated by the Pearson correlation. Independent risk factors for LC patients with LNM were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Afterward, patients were randomly divided into training and test sets in a ratio of 8 to 2. On this basis, we established logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithm models based on ML. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value, accuracy, precision, recall rate, F1-score, specificity, and Brier score was adopted to evaluate and compare the prediction performance of the models. Finally, the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the association between each feature variable and target variables based on the best model. Results: Of the 4887 total LC patients, 3409 were without LNM (69.76%), and 1478 had LNM (30.24%). The result of the Pearson correlation showed that variables were weakly correlated with each other. The independent risk factors for LC patients with LNM were age at diagnosis, race, primary site, number of tumours, tumour size, grade, and T-stage. Among six models, XGBoost displayed a better performance for predicting LNM, with five performance metrics outperforming other models in the training set (AUC: 0.791 (95% CI: 0.776-0.806), accuracy: 0.739, recall rate: 0.638, F1-score: 0.663, and Brier score: 0.165), and similar results were observed in the test set. Moreover, the SHAP value of XGBoost was calculated, and the result showed that the three features, T-stage, primary site, and grade, had the greatest impact on predicting the outcomes. Conclusions: The XGBoost model performed better and can be applied to forecast the LNM of LC, offering a valuable and significant reference for clinicians in advanced decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.