ArticleInternational journal of women's health2022
Assessment of Implementation Outcome Measures for Positive Deviance Approach as a New Strategy to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding: A Psychometric Follow-Up Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Mobile Phone Messaging-Based Message-Framing Intervention for Promoting Maternal and Newborn Care Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implementation outcomes are the effects of deliberate actions while implementing new interventions which explain the process and are preconditions to achieve the desired outcomes. Positive Deviance Approach (PDA) was implemented as a new strategy to mitigate the gaps of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practice in Jimma, Ethiopia. However, there was no evidence to what extent intervention participants' perceive/rate these outcomes. In addition, psychometric outcome measures lack conceptual clarity, have unknown reliability and validity to the context. Therefore, we aimed to assess implementation outcomes, determine valid and reliable scales and analyze their correlation and variation explained. Methods: A post-implementation follow-up study was conducted between August 28, 2020 and September 30, 2020 among the intervention participants of an earlier trial. A sample of 384 participants was invited to respond to an interviewer (or self)-administered structured questionnaire. The developed tool was refined through experts' comment, pre-test, and using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine the measurement scales, and Total Variability Explained (TVE). The reliability test was done. The mean scores were determined which indicates the extent of each scale's rate. Pearson's correlation, independent sample Results: This study identified nine implementation outcomes of PDA as a new strategy to promote EBF with a TVE 72.1%. 52 valid and reliable items were developed to measure these outcomes. The maximum mean score was for "appropriateness scale" - 27.81 (6.5SD), while the minimum was for "implementation cost scale" - 11.37 (5.2SD). The overall mean score was 164.18 (26.8SD). The emerged scales explained 72.1% of the total variability in implementation outcomes. Majority (6) of outcomes of PDA were highly rated. Implementation fidelity, penetration, organizational readiness, and sustainability scores were positively and significantly correlated with acceptability of the approach. Conclusion: This study identified nine valid, reliable, well explained and correlated implementation outcomes which help to understand the success of PDA as a new strategy to promote EBF. Majority of outcome measures were highly rated by intervention participants, which suggests it is a promising approach in promoting EBF in urban community by PDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.