Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36411721›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2022

Virtual residency recruitment: future directions in the new era.

Daniel Breitkopf, Cheryll Albold, Jonathan Barlow, Venkatesh Bellamkonda, Claire Dorcent, Annie Sadosty, Michelle Clarke, Daniel Cabrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Initial Experiences With a 2-Stage Residency Interview Process.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024
    Article
  5. Resident Recruitment in a New Era.International anesthesiology clinics · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel BreitkopfMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cheryll AlboldMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jonathan BarlowMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-8064
Venkatesh BellamkondaMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Claire DorcentMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Annie SadostyMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michelle ClarkeMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.
Daniel CabreraMayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to many changes in healthcare including graduate medical education (GME). Residency and fellowship programs halted in-person recruitment and pivoted to virtual models. Residency selection and recruitment were practices ripe for redesign, as they relied on in-person interviewing as the major point of contact prior to match list creation. In this commentary, we review the state of virtual interviewing and propose a future state where virtual interactions are commonplace and integrated into a comprehensive recruitment process. DISCUSSION: Virtual recruitment has led to a reduction of expenses, improved time efficiency for all parties and a reduced carbon footprint. Residency match outcomes have not changed substantially with the advent of virtual interviewing. Hybrid approaches, including virtual and in-person options have significant drawbacks and pitfalls which may limit adoption. Given the upheaval in GME recruitment caused by the pandemic, and the limitations of current methods for candidate assessment and interactions with programs, further innovation is needed to achieve an optimal state for all stakeholders. Multiple technology innovations are on the horizon which may improve the ability to interact virtually. Adoption of new technology along with expanding the timeline for residency recruitment may further optimize the process for both applicants and programs.

conclusionsThe GME community was able to adopt technology for the recruitment interview rapidly due to the pandemic. As more opportunities for technology-based interactions grow, the opportunity exists to reimagine recruitment beyond the interview. While resources are constrained, some of the efficiencies gained by adopting virtual interviewing can be leveraged to expand the interactions between programs and applicants. Incorporation of in-person interaction may still be needed. Models will need to be developed to build upon the best characteristics of the virtual and in-person environments to optimize GME recruitment.KEY MESSAGES:Virtual communication methods have substantially changed residency recruitment during the COVID -19 pandemic.COVID -19 related changes in residency recruitment, including wide adoption of virtual methods, should be maintained and strengthened.Efforts should be made to advance the gains in residency recruitment strategy during the pandemic by use of technologies that expand virtual interactions beyond the interview.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internship and ResidencyEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansPandemicsemerging conferencing toolshybrid interviewin-person interviewrecent pandemicresident recruitmentresident selectionVirtual interviewweb conferencing platforms

Identifiers

PMID36411721
PMCPMC9704106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.