ArticleThoracic cancer2023
Real-world treatment and prognostic factors for survival in ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases in China.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of different treatment modalities on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs).
methodsA total of 86 patients were enrolled into the study. They were divided into two cohorts based on their history of treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) prior to the incidence of BMs. ALK-TKI-naïve patients with BMs were included in cohort 1 (n = 59); patients who developed BMs after ALK-TKIs treatment were enrolled in cohort 2 (n = 27). Prognostic factors related with overall survival (OS) when treated with ALK-TKIs were assessed in multivariable analysis.
resultsWith a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the median OS was 34.8 months. In cohort 1, the OS, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were 38.7 months (95% CI: 23.3 to 54.1), 18.5 months (95% CI: 9.6 to 27.4), and 19.1 months (95% CI: 13.7 to 24.5), respectively. Significantly improved OS and iPFS were noted in those patients in which second-generation ALK-TKIs versus crizotinib were initiated (OS: not reached vs. 29.0 months, p = 0.040; iPFS: 22.8 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.035). In cohort 2, patients who experienced BMs as a result of the treatment failure of ALK-TKIs had a median OS of 27.1 months. Considerable duration of stable disease in patients with measurable BMs was observed (iPFS: 11.5 months, 95% CI: 4.4 to 18.6; PFS: 12.2 months, 95% CI: 3.2 to 21.1).
conclusionSecond-generation ALK-TKIs further improved the duration of intracranial response and survival in ALK+ NSCLC patients with BMs in a real-world setting. The potent intracranial efficacy of second-generation ALK-TKIs might generate the lowered urgency of local treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.