Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36411428›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Physiotherapists' opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study.

Connor Gleadhill, Katarzyna Bolsewicz, Simon R E Davidson, Steven J Kamper, Amanda Tutty, Emma Robson, Priscilla Viana Da Silva, Bruce Donald, Katherine Dooley, Joshua Manvell and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current state of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The scholarly and practice profile of respiratory therapists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Connor GleadhillSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. connor.gleadhill@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-6237
Katarzyna BolsewiczSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Simon R E DavidsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Steven J KamperSchool of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Amanda TuttyNorthern NSW Local Health District, Lismore, Australia.
Emma RobsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Priscilla Viana Da SilvaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Bruce DonaldJohn Hunter Hospital Physiotherapy, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.
Katherine DooleySchool of Allied Health, Exercise and Sport, Charles Sturt University, Orange, Australia.
Joshua ManvellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.
Nicole ManvellNuMoves Physiotherapy, Newcastle, Australia.
Andrew DelbridgeRegent Street Physiotherapy, New Lambton, Australia.
Christopher M WilliamsSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysiotherapists deliver evidence-based guideline recommended treatments only half of the time to patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Physiotherapists' behaviour in clinical practice are influenced by many cognitive, social, and environmental factors including time and financial pressures. Many initiatives aimed at improving physiotherapists' uptake of evidence-based care have failed to appreciate the context involved in clinical decisions and clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to describe: i) opinions toward evidence; ii) how evidence is accessed; iii) factors influencing evidence access; iv) factors influencing evidence application, for physiotherapists working in regional areas.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods study with online survey and focus groups. We included registered physiotherapists in the survey and physiotherapists practising in regional New South Wales in the focus groups. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to inform all research objectives. We used eight domains of the Transtheoretical Domains Framework to design survey questions. We analysed quantitative and qualitative data in parallel, then integrated both sources through by developing a matrix while considering the Transtheoretical Domains Framework domains to generate themes.

resultsFifty-seven physiotherapists participated in the study (survey only n = 41; focus group only n = 8; both survey and focus group n = 8). Participants reported that evidence was important, but they also considered patient expectations, colleagues' treatment choices, and business demands in clinical decision making. Physiotherapists reported they access evidence on average 30 minutes or less per week. Competing demands like business administration tasks are barriers to accessing evidence. Participants reported that patient expectations were a major barrier to applying evidence in practice. Environmental and systemic factors, like funding structures or incentives for evidence-based care, and social factors, like lacking or having a culture of accountability and mentorship, were reported as both barriers and enablers to evidence application.

conclusionsThis study provides context to physiotherapists' opinion, access, and application of evidence in clinical practice. Physiotherapists' provision of evidence-based care may be improved by enhancing structural support from workplaces to access and apply evidence and exploring discrepancies between physiotherapists' perceptions of patient expectations and actual patient expectations.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesPhysical TherapistsEvidence-Based MedicineFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-based practiceEvidence uptakeImplementationMixed-methodsPhysiotherapyResearch engagement

Identifiers

PMID36411428
PMCPMC9677623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.