ArticleScientific reports2022
Establishment of a digital PCR method for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex DNA in cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers of Lyme neuroborreliosis: a systematic review.Infection · 2026Review
- Article
- From forest floor to doctor's office: the immunological journey ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Establishment and application of a dual chip digital PCR assay for detection of PDCoV and PEDV.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Present and Future Applications of Digital PCR in Infectious Diseases Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases (ESBLs) ProducingMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Developing a Prospective Gestational Lyme Disease Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Direct detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato bacteria in patient samples for diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is hampered by low diagnostic sensitivity, due to few bacteria in cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) samples. Evaluation of novel molecular methods, including digital PCR (dPCR), as future tools in diagnostics of LNB is desirable. This study aimed to establish a dPCR assay and validate pre-PCR procedures for detection of Borrelia in CSF. Synthetic DNA fragments and cultured Borrelia reference strains were used during optimisation experiments. In addition, 59 CSF specimens from patients examined for LNB were included for clinical validation. The results showed that the pre-PCR parameters with the highest impact on Borrelia-specific dPCR method performance were incubation of the PCR-plate at 4 °C for stabilization of droplets, centrifugation for target concentration, quick-spin for dPCR rain reduction, and PCR inhibition by matrix components. Borrelia DNA in CSF was detected in one out of nine patients with LNB. Diagnostic sensitivity was determined to be 11.1% and specificity 100%. In conclusion, this study reports an optimized Borrelia-specific dPCR method for direct detection of Borrelia in CSF samples. The present study does not support the use of Borrelia-specific dPCR as a routine method for diagnosing LNB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.