Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36411153›Full record

ReviewAcademic radiology2023

Multiparametric Data-driven Imaging Markers: Guidelines for Development, Application and Reporting of Model Outputs in Radiomics.

Xiaofeng Wang, Gene Pennello, Nandita M deSouza, Erich P Huang, Andrew J Buckler, Huiman X Barnhart, Jana G Delfino, David L Raunig, Lu Wang, Alexander R Guimaraes and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/JJN3, Cleveland, OH 44195. Electronic address: wangx6@ccf.org.
Gene PennelloCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration Division of Imaging, Diagnostic and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Nandita M deSouzaDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, European Society of Radiology, London, UK.
Erich P HuangDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Andrew J BucklerEuclid Bioimaging, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts.
Huiman X BarnhartDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Jana G DelfinoCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
David L RaunigData Science Institute, Statistical and Quantitative Sciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Lu WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/JJN3, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Alexander R GuimaraesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Timothy J HallDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Nancy A ObuchowskiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/JJN3, Cleveland, OH 44195.

Funding

MR Fingerprinting for EpilepsyR01NS109439 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Dan Ma, Zhong Irene Wang · 2019 to 2026
$4.2M
Comprehensive MR Fingerprinting for Infants and Young Children at Risk for Developmental Delays.R01HD112923 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Dan Ma, DEANNE E WILSON-COSTELLO · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD112923NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is the fifth in a five-part series on statistical methodology for performance assessment of multi-parametric quantitative imaging biomarkers (mpQIBs) for radiomic analysis. Radiomics is the process of extracting visually imperceptible features from radiographic medical images using data-driven algorithms. We refer to the radiomic features as data-driven imaging markers (DIMs), which are quantitative measures discovered under a data-driven framework from images beyond visual recognition but evident as patterns of disease processes irrespective of whether or not ground truth exists for the true value of the DIM. This paper aims to set guidelines on how to build machine learning models using DIMs in radiomics and to apply and report them appropriately. We provide a list of recommendations, named RANDAM (an abbreviation of "Radiomic ANalysis and DAta Modeling"), for analysis, modeling, and reporting in a radiomic study to make machine learning analyses in radiomics more reproducible. RANDAM contains five main components to use in reporting radiomics studies: design, data preparation, data analysis and modeling, reporting, and material availability. Real case studies in lung cancer research are presented along with simulation studies to compare different feature selection methods and several validation strategies.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiagnostic ImagingHumansLungROC Curvedata-driven imaging markersmachine learningpredictionradiomicsreporting

Identifiers

PMID36411153
PMCPMC9825652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.