Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36411030›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2023

Conclusion of diagnostic odysseys due to inversions disrupting

Alistair T Pagnamenta, Jing Yu, Julie Evans, Philip Twiss, Genomics England Research Consortium, Musculoskeletal GeCIP MDT, Amaka C Offiah, Mohamed Wafik, Sarju G Mehta, Mohammed K Javaid and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Alistair T PagnamentaWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK alistair@well.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7334-0602
Jing YuWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Julie EvansBristol Genetics Laboratory, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Philip TwissCambridge Genomics Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Genomics England Research Consortium
Musculoskeletal GeCIP MDT
Amaka C OffiahAcademic Unit of Child Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-5036
Mohamed WafikDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sarju G MehtaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Mohammed K JavaidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Sarah F SmithsonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Jenny C TaylorWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3602-5704
Centre for Human Genetics · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Child Health · INNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/W01761X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genetic testing methodologies are biased towards picking up structural variants (SVs) that alter copy number. Copy-neutral rearrangements such as inversions are therefore likely to suffer from underascertainment. In this study, manual review prompted by a virtual multidisciplinary team meeting and subsequent bioinformatic prioritisation of data from the 100K Genomes Project was performed across 43 genes linked to well-characterised skeletal disorders. Ten individuals from three independent families were found to harbour diagnostic inversions. In two families, inverted segments of 1.2/14.8 Mb unequivocally disrupted

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, DevelopmentalChromosome InversionAcrocephalosyndactyliaAdipokinesBase SequenceChromosome MappingFibrillin-1Genetic TestingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsZinc Finger Protein Gli3AdipokinesFBN1 protein, humanFibrillin-1GLI3 protein, humanhomeobox protein HOXA13Homeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsZinc Finger Protein Gli3Gene RearrangementGenomicsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMusculoskeletal DiseasesSequence Inversion

Identifiers

PMID36411030
PMCPMC10176330
OpenAlexW4309496707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.