Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36410837›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews.

Kayleigh Sheen, Laura Goodfellow, Katie Balling, Janice Rymer, Andrew Weeks, Helen Spiby, Pauline Slade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kayleigh SheenSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-1763
Laura GoodfellowDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Katie BallingDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Janice RymerSchool of Medical Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew WeeksDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Helen SpibySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Pauline SladeDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Pauline.Slade@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBKing's College London · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the events perceived as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists (O&G), and to examine factors contributing to the perception of trauma.

designMixed methods: cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. SAMPLE AND

settingFellows, members and trainees of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).

methodsAn online survey was distributed to 6300 fellows (May-June 2017), members and trainees of RCOG; 1095 (17%) completed surveys were returned. Of these, 728 (66%) reported work-related trauma experience, with 525 providing a brief description of an event. Forty-three participants with trauma experience were purposively sampled and completed an in-depth interview (October 2017-March 2018), which were analysed using Template Analysis. Information regarding the scale and impact of trauma experience is presented elsewhere. The present analysis provides new information describing the events and perceptions of why events were traumatic. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The nature of traumatic events in this clinical setting, taken from survey descriptions of perceived traumatic events and information from the in-depth interviews.

resultsEvents perceived as traumatic by O&G were similar between consultants, trainees and other RCOG members no longer working in O&G. Maternal or neonatal death/stillbirth, haemorrhage and events involving a difficult delivery were most frequently reported. Sudden and unpredictable events, perceived preventability, acute sensory experiences and high emotionality contributed to trauma perception. Respondents' trauma was compounded by an absence of support, involvement in investigation procedures and pre-existing relationships with a recipient of care.

conclusionsIdentification of events most likely to be perceived as traumatic, and wider circumstances contributing to the perception of trauma, provide a basis on which to focus preventative and supportive strategies for O&G. Training on the nature of traumatic events, self-help for early stress responses, processing support and rapid access to trauma-focused psychological input (where required) are needed.

Indexed as

ConsultantsHealth PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyStillbirthSurveys and Questionnairesgynaecologyobstetricsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36410837
PMCPMC9680185
OpenAlexW4309531240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.