Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36410817›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Cognitive function and treatment response trajectories in first-episode schizophrenia: evidence from a prospective cohort study.

Edward Millgate, Kira Griffiths, Alice Egerton, Eugenia Kravariti, Cecilia Casetta, Bill Deakin, Richard Drake, Oliver D Howes, Laura Kassoumeri, Sobia Khan and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Edward MillgateDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-8261
Kira GriffithsDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Alice EgertonDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Eugenia KravaritiDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Cecilia CasettaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Bill DeakinDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Richard DrakeDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-4835
Oliver D HowesDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Laura KassoumeriDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Sobia KhanDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Steve LankshearResearch and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jane LeesDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Shon LewisDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Elena MikulskayaDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ebenezer OloyedeDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Rebecca OwensDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rebecca PollardDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-6891
Nathalie RichDepartment of Epidemiology & Applied Clinical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Sophie SmartDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Aviv SegevDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Kyra Verena SendtDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
James MacCabeDepartment of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK james.maccabe@kcl.ac.uk.
STRATA Consortium

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/L011794/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis prospective cohort study tested for associations between baseline cognitive performance in individuals early within their first episode and antipsychotic treatment of psychosis. We hypothesised that poorer cognitive functioning at the initial assessment would be associated with poorer antipsychotic response following the subsequent 6 weeks.

designProspective cohort .

settingNational Health Service users with a first-episode schizophrenia diagnosis, recently starting antipsychotic medication, recruited from two UK sites (King's College London, UK and University of Manchester, UK). Participants attended three study visits following screening.

participantsEighty-nine participants were recruited, with 46 included in the main analysis. Participants required to be within the first 2 years of illness onset, had received minimal antipsychotic treatment, have the capacity to provide consent, and be able to read and write in English. Participants were excluded if they met remission criteria or showed mild to no symptoms. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Antipsychotic response was determined at 6 weeks using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), with cognitive performance assessed at each visit using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The groups identified (responders and non-responders) from trajectory analyses, as well as from >20% PANSS criteria, were compared on baseline BACS performance.

resultsTrajectory analyses identified 84.78% of the sample as treatment responsive, and the remaining 15.22% as treatment non-responsive. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions observed no significant relationship between baseline BACS on subscale and total performance (BACS t-score: OR=0.98, p=0.620, Cohen's d=0.218) and antipsychotic response at 6 weeks.

conclusionsThis investigation identified two clear trajectories of treatment response in the first 6 weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Responder and non-responder groups did not significantly differ on performance on the BACS, suggesting that larger samples may be required or that an association between cognitive performance and antipsychotic response is not observable in the first 2 years of illness onset. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: REC: 17/NI/0209.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaCognitionCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesState MedicineAntipsychotic AgentsAdult psychiatryMENTAL HEALTHSchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID36410817
PMCPMC9680154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.