ArticleBMJ open2022
Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward health research ethics and research ethics committees among healthcare postgraduate students, faculty, and professionals in The Gambia.Research ethics · 2026Article
- Harnessing data science to control non-communicable diseases in Africa: a systematic review and gap analysis.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- What do Tanzanian Research Ethics Committees prioritise? A quantitative analysis of reviewer comments using Emanuel's framework.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Experiences of researchers in navigating applied research in the MENA region: an exploratory online cross-sectional survey.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Research ethics committees and regulation of climate change and health research.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
- Digital platforms for ethics review: a mini review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Translational barriers to phage endolysin deployment for antimicrobial resistance control in Africa.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- COVID-19 and ethics in action: Insights from African research committees.Journal of public health in Africa · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Recommendations of Stakeholders Regarding Ethical Oversight of Data Science Health Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Graduates of Caribbean Training Program Contribute to Strengthening Bioethics Systems, but More Support is Needed.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025Review
- Health Research Ethics in Southern Africa: Building Capacity and Cultivating Excellence.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025Article
- Going paperless: the strengths and limitations of electronic research ethics information management system in a health training institution in Tanzania.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Perspectives of stakeholders on post-trial access arrangements in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025Article
- Health Data Sciences and Cardiovascular Disease in Africa: Needs and the Way Forward.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Private commercial companies sharing health-relevant consumer data with health researchers in sub-Saharan Africa: an ethical exploration.Policy studies (Policy Studies Institute) · 2024Article
- Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Article
- The promise of data science for health research in Africa.Nature communications · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHealth-related research in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has grown over the years. However, concerns have been raised about the state of research ethics committees (RECs). This scoping review examines the literature on RECs for health-related research in SSA and identifies strategies that have been applied to strengthen the RECs. It focuses on three aspects of RECs: regulatory governance and leadership, administrative and financial capacity and technical capacity of members.
designA scoping review of published literature, including grey literature, was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach. DATA SOURCES: BioOne, CINAHL, Embase (via Ovid), Education Abstracts, Global Health, Google Scholar, Jstor, OpenEdition (French), Philosopher's Index, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Citation and Expanded Index (Web of Science), reference lists of included studies and specific grey literature sources. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included empirical studies on RECs for health-related research in SSA, covering topics on REC leadership and governance, administrative and financial capacity and the technical capacity of REC members. We included studies published between 01 January 2000 and 18 February 2022 and written in English, French, Portuguese or Swahili. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened the records. Data were extracted by one reviewer and cross-checked by another. Owing to the heterogeneity of included studies, thematic analysis was used.
resultsWe included 54 studies. The findings show that most RECs in SSA work under significant administrative and financial constraints, with few opportunities for capacity building for committee members. This has an impact on the quality of reviews and the overall performance of RECs. Although most countries have national governance systems for RECs, they lack regulations on accountability, transparency and monitoring of RECs.
conclusionsThis review provides a comprehensive overview of the literature on RECs for health-related research in SSA and contributes to our understanding of how RECs can be strengthened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.