Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36410776›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2022

Gaming for Adherence to Medication using Ehealth in Rheumatoid arthritis (GAMER) study: a randomised controlled trial.

Bart P H Pouls, Charlotte L Bekker, Fatma Gundogan, Renske Cf Hebing, Hein Aw van Onzenoort, Liesbeth I van de Ven, Harald E Vonkeman, Rob Tieben, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Sandra van Dulmen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bart P H PoulsResearch & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands bart.pouls@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5715-1668
Charlotte L BekkerDepartment of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Fatma GundoganPharmacy, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Renske Cf HebingPharmacy, Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Centre Reade, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-6719
Hein Aw van OnzenoortDepartment of Pharmacy Radboudumc, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth I van de VenPharmacy, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Harald E VonkemanDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rob TiebenResearch, Development and Innovation, Game Solutions Lab, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Johanna E VriezekolkResearch & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenHealthcare Communication, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart Van den BemtResearch & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLGelre Hospitals · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLReade · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effect on adherence to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of a serious game that targeted implicit attitudes toward medication.

methodsA multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed with adults with RA that used DMARDs and possessed a smartphone/tablet. Control and intervention groups received care as usual. The intervention group played the serious game at will during 3 months. Game play data and online questionnaires Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR), Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) were collected. Primary outcome was DMARD implementation adherence operationalised as the difference in proportion of non-adherent participants (<80% taking adherence) between intervention and control group after 3 months using a Chi-squared test. Two sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were performed to test for differences on secondary outcomes.

resultsOf the 110 intervention participants that started the study, 87 participants (79%) installed the game and had a median playtime of 9.7 hours at 3 months. Overall, 186 participants completed the study. Adherence in intervention group (63%) and control group (54%) did not differ significantly (p=0.13) at 3 months. Neither were there differences oberved in CQR continuous score, beliefs about medication (BMQ) or clinical outcomes (HAQ and RADAI).

conclusionA serious game aimed at reinterpreting attitudes toward medication failed to show an effect on adherence to DMARDs or clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The game was played frequently indicating that it can be an effective channel for reaching patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7217.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidTelemedicineVideo GamesAdultHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication AdherenceAntirheumatic AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsHealth services researchRheumatoid Arthritis

Identifiers

PMID36410776
PMCPMC9680317
OpenAlexW4309656338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.