Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36410257›Full record

Observational studyBrazilian journal of physical therapy

Physical therapists and public perceptions of telerehabilitation: An online open survey on acceptability, preferences, and needs.

Lívia G Fernandes, Rafael F F Oliveira, Pamela M Barros, Felipe R C Fagundes, Renato J Soares, Bruno T Saragiotto

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post-Acute COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Telerehabilitation for peripheral facial palsy: A scoping review.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lívia G FernandesMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Centre for Pain, Health, and Lifestyle (CPHL) Brazil. Electronic address: lfernandesft@gmail.com.
Rafael F F OliveiraMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Centre for Pain, Health, and Lifestyle (CPHL) Brazil.
Pamela M BarrosMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Felipe R C FagundesMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Renato J SoaresPhysical Therapy Department, Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno T SaragiottoMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Centre for Pain, Health, and Lifestyle (CPHL) Brazil; Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo · BRThe University of Sydney · AUUniversidade de Taubaté · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation allowed the continuation of physical therapy care in parallel with public health measures to prevent the virus spread. However, in low- and middle-income countries including Brazil, telerehabilitation was unfamiliar to most of the population.

objectiveTo investigate acceptability, preferences, and needs in telerehabilitation by Brazilian physical therapists and the general population.

methodsWe conducted an observational cross-sectional study with an online survey consisting of 13 multiple-choice items. Items were distributed among acceptability, preferences, and needs sections, and encompassed confidence in delivering or receiving telerehabilitation, its perceived efficacy and costs, and suitable content.

resultsA total of 1107 responses were registered, 717 from physical therapists. Half of them self-reported confidence in conducting telerehabilitation through the internet (synchronous or asynchronous). The same proportion disagreed that telerehabilitation is as effective as in-person interventions. Physical therapists agreed telerehabilitation should contain educational, self-management strategies, and exercises information, but the general population endorsed the provision of technical advice on exercise execution. The general population mostly reported that telerehabilitation could help their specific health condition (86%), but only 14% of respondents would pay the same as they pay for in-person consultations. Participants reported an overall preference for synchronous communication and concern about the lack of a hands-on approach.

conclusionPhysical therapists and the general population appear to demonstrate apprehension towards telerehabilitation. Insufficient preparation or inadequate knowledge might influence participants' acceptance, preferences, and needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physical TherapistsTelerehabilitationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPublic OpinionSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital physical therapyPandemicPerceptionRehabilitationTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36410257
PMCPMC9659283
OpenAlexW4309658517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.