Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36410160›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2023

Validation and implementation of an orthopoxvirus qualitative real-time PCR for the diagnosis of monkeypox in the clinical laboratory.

Katharine Uhteg, Heba H Mostafa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation and clinical validation of monkeypox (mpox) virus real-time PCR assays.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine UhtegJohns Hopkins Hospital Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Meyer B1-121F, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287-7093, USA.
Heba H MostafaJohns Hopkins Hospital Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Meyer B1-121F, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287-7093, USA; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Meyer B1-121F, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7093, USA. Electronic address: hmostaf2@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe globally concerning outbreak of monkeypox virus (MPXV) in non-endemic countries in 2022 warranted an increased capacity of diagnostic clinical testing. In this study, we detail the Johns Hopkins analytical validation of a qualitative orthopoxvirus real-time PCR and characterize its analytical performance for MPXV testing. We also describe our first month of MPXV clinical laboratory diagnosis, including assay utilization and positivity.

methodsThe analytical performance of a previously characterized orthopoxvirus assay that targets the DNA polymerase gene of non-variola orthopoxviruses was determined. In silico inclusivity analysis was performed for the primer and probe sequences. The limit of detection, reproducibility, agreement, and specificity were evaluated as well as target stability at room temperature. Clinical chart reviews were performed for patients who received testing within the first month of offering the assay for diagnosis.

resultsAlignment of the primer and probe binding regions of 151 sequenced genomes of MPXV from 2022 showed Sequence homology of 100%. The assay was able to detect MPXV at a concentration of at least 100 copies/mL and showed no cross reactivity with other organisms tested. Targets were stable for at least one week at room temperature. During the first month of implementation, a total of 33 patients were tested, 11 of whom were positive and presented mainly with rash in the genital region.

conclusionsIncreased availability of MPXV testing is essential with the progressive increase in the number of cases. The non-variola orthopoxvirus assay is a sensitive and reproducible method for diagnosing monkeypox during the current surge in cases.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxOrthopoxvirusDNA, ViralHumansLaboratories, ClinicalMonkeypox virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA, ViralMonkeypox virus (MPXV)Orthopoxvirus (OPXV)Real-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID36410160
PMCPMC9650690
OpenAlexW4309480393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.