Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409935›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2022

High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.

Dean-An Ling, Chih-Wei Sung, Cheng-Chung Fang, Chia-Hsin Ko, Eric H Chou, Jeffrey Herrala, Tsung-Chien Lu, Chien-Hua Huang, Chu-Lin Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dean-An LingNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei SungNational Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chung FangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Hsin KoNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eric H ChouBaylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas.
Jeffrey HerralaHighland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California.
Tsung-Chien LuNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Hua HuangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chu-Lin TsaiNational Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough factors related to a return visit to the emergency department (ED) have been reported, only a few studies have examined "high-risk" ED revisits with serious adverse outcomes. In this study we aimed to describe the incidence and trend of high-risk ED revisits in United States EDs and to investigate factors associated with these revisits.

methodsWe obtained data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 2010-2018. Adult ED revisits within 72 hours of a previous discharge were identified using a mark on the patient record form. We defined high-risk revisits as revisits with serious adverse outcomes, including intensive care unit admissions, emergency surgery, cardiac catheterization, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during the return visit. We performed analyses using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression, accounting for NHAMCS's complex survey design.

resultsOver the nine-year study period, there were an estimated 37,700,000 revisits, and the proportion of revisits in the entire ED population decreased slightly from 5.1% in 2010 to 4.5% in 2018 (P for trend = 0.02). By contrast, there were an estimated 827,000 high-risk ED revisits, and the proportion of high-risk revisits in the entire ED population remained stable at approximately 0.1%. The mean age of these high-risk revisit patients was 57 years, and 43% were men. Approximately 6% of the patients were intubated, and 13% received CPR. Most of them were hospitalized, and 2% died in the ED. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (65+ years), Hispanic ethnicity, daytime visits, and arrival by ambulance during the revisit were independent predictors of high-risk revisits.

conclusionHigh-risk revisits accounted for a relatively small fraction (0.1%) of ED visits. Over the period of the NHAMCS survey between 2010-2018, this fraction remained stable. We identified factors during the return visit that could be used to label high-risk revisits for timely intervention.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAmbulancesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36409935
PMCPMC9683777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.