Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409734›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prevalence, causes, impacts, and management of needle phobia: An international survey of a general adult population.

Kimberly Alsbrooks, Klaus Hoerauf

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06845605 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Qualitative Exploration Study of Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives in Haemodialysis Needling to Enhance Patients' Overall Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorEast and North Hertfordshire NHS TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled16ConditionsPerspective of Healthcare Professionals Haemodialysis Needling, Dialysis
NCT07498621 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Efficiency and Adult Patient Satisfaction: Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Simple Tooth Extraction in a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Abdulaziz UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsPain Perception of the New DeviceArmsneedle-free anesthesia jet (Comfort-in™), Conventional dental syringe injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kimberly AlsbrooksBecton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8684-7100
Klaus HoeraufBecton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States of America.
Becton Dickinson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Needle phobia is an overlooked condition that affects virtually all medical procedures. Our study aimed to identify how commonly needle phobia is experienced, its underlying reasons, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies. A global survey was conducted in a general adult population using a questionnaire based on a targeted literature review that identified under-researched areas. The 21-item questionnaire was completed on a secure, web-based survey platform. Statistical analyses and models were utilized to identify relationships between participant characteristics and needle phobia. Of the 2,098 participants enrolled in the study, 63.2% (n = 1,325) reported experiencing needle phobia, and rated the intensity of their fear as 5.7 (±2.6) on average on a scale from 0 (no fear) to 10 (very strong/unreasonable fear or avoidance). According to the logistic regression model, other medical fears (odds coefficient = 2.14) and family history (1.67) were the most important factors associated with needle phobia. General anxiety (96.1%) and pain (95.5%) were the most common reasons for needle fear. Of the participants experiencing needle phobia, 52.2% stated avoiding blood draws, followed by 49.0% for blood donations, and 33.1% for vaccinations. While 24.3% of participants have seen a therapist, most have never sought help. The majority have shared their fear with nurses (61.1%) or physicians (44.4%); however, the provider helpfulness was rated as 4.9 (±3.1) on average on a scale from 0 (unhelpful) to 10 (extremely helpful). Utilizing non-invasive alternatives (94.1%) and smaller needles (91.1%) were most commonly identified as potential device-related solutions to alleviate fear; distractions (92.1%) and relaxation techniques (91.7%) were the top non-device-related approaches. Our findings highlight the prevalent nature of needle phobia and provide insights into its etiology and effects on patient care. Clinician responses were not perceived as helpful, emphasizing the need to address needle phobia, and improve patient experience.

Indexed as

Phobic DisordersAdultCausalityHumansPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36409734
PMCPMC9678288
OpenAlexW4309495106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.