Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409602›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Levofloxacin prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia within an endemic country for carbapenem-resistant GNB.

Daniela Clerici, Laura Galli, Raffaella Greco, Anna P Lugli, Federico Erbella, Marco Ripa, Chiara Tassan Din, Rosamaria Nitti, Fabio Giglio, Sara Mastaglio and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela ClericiHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Laura GalliClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella GrecoHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-5328
Anna P LugliUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Federico ErbellaHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Marco RipaClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6380-0377
Chiara Tassan DinClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Rosamaria NittiHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Fabio GiglioHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sara MastaglioHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesca LorentinoHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta XueHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FarinaHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Carmine LiberatoreHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0948-9343
Andrea PoliClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Silvia CarlettiLaboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Maria T Lupo StanghelliniHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo G CarrabbaHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-4839
Andrea A AssanelliHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Annalisa RuggeriHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Massimo BernardiHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-0851
Consuelo CortiHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-8571
Jacopo PeccatoriHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Nicasio ManciniUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-0910
Paolo ScarpelliniClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Fabio CiceriHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Antonella CastagnaClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Chiara OltoliniClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis's (FQ-P) usefulness in patients with neutropenia is controversial. In recent decades, Italian epidemiological data has shown worrisome rates of FQ resistance. A single-center cohort study on 136 autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCTs) and 223 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCTs) was performed from January 2018 to December 2020. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the first-line therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). Since February 2019, FQ-P has been omitted. We evaluated the day +30 posttransplant cumulative incidence function (CIF) of gram-negative bacteria pre-engraftment bloodstream infections (PE-BSIs) and any changes in antimicrobial resistance, FN, and infection-related mortality (IRM). In ASCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 74.3% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .66). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 10.1%, with a significant difference according to FQ-P (0% [LEVO-group] vs 14.1% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .016). CIF of IRM was 0% in both groups. In allo-HSCTs, ≥1 FN episode occurred in 96.4% of transplants, without differences among groups (P = .72). CIF of gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI was 28%, significantly higher without FQ-P (14.7% [LEVO-group] vs 34.4% [NO-LEVO-group], P = .003). CIF of IRM was 5%, superimposable in both groups (P = .62). Comparing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria of allo-HSCT setting, in the group without FQ-P, a significantly higher proportion of pathogens was susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam (71% vs 30%, P = .026), FQ (49% vs 10%, P = .03), and carbapenems (95% vs 50%, P = .001). FQ-P discontinuation increased gram-negative bacteria PE-BSI but did not impact IRM, both in the ASCT and allo-HSCT settings; importantly, it concurred to significantly decrease antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsNeutropeniaCarbapenemsCohort StudiesGram-Negative BacteriaHumansLevofloxacinPiperacillinRetrospective StudiesTazobactamTransplantation, HomologousAnti-Infective AgentsCarbapenemsLevofloxacinPiperacillinTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID36409602
PMCPMC10182274
OpenAlexW4309518658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.