Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409556›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2022

Cardiopulmonary and propofol-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine in total intravenous anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Mariana C Sanches, Wellington H Bessi, Elidiane Rusch, Marianna B Schaffhausser, Ana A Cassoli, Silvio H Freitas, Martielo I Gehrcke, Adriano B Carregaro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariana C SanchesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5852-7233
Wellington H BessiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elidiane RuschDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marianna B SchaffhausserDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana A CassoliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvio H FreitasDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Martielo I GehrckeDepartament of Veterinary Clinics, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Adriano B CarregaroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0580-0467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on the propofol-based anesthesia of cats subjected to ovariohysterectomy.

methodsTwenty-eight cats were randomly allocated to four groups (seven cats in each) and premedicated with either 5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (groups Dex 1, Dex 3 and Dex 5) or 0.05 ml saline (Prop group) intramuscularly. After the induction of anesthesia with propofol, total intravenous anesthesia was initiated with 300 µg/kg/min propofol plus 3 ml/kg/h NaCl 0.9% (Prop), or 200 µg/kg/min propofol plus dexmedetomidine at the rates of 1 µg/kg/h (Dex 1), 3 µg/kg/h (Dex 3) or 5 µg/kg/h (Dex 5). Cardiorespiratory variables were assessed 5 mins after induction and every 10 mins thereafter, until the end of anesthesia. The propofol infusion rate was adjusted every 10 mins (± 50 µg/kg/min) to maintain anesthetic depth. The times to extubation, sternal recumbency, ambulation and total recovery were recorded. Pain scoring was performed 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the end of anesthesia.

resultsDexmedetomidine produced a propofol-sparing effect of 72.8%, 71.1% and 74.6% in the Dex 1, Dex 3 and Dex 5 groups, respectively. Cats in the Prop group maintained higher heart rate values than the other groups, and the mean arterial pressure remained higher in the Dex 3 and Dex 5 groups. Rescue intraoperative analgesia (fentanyl bolus) was most frequent in the Prop group. There was no significant difference in the time of extubation. Cats in the Dex 1 and Dex 3 groups had a faster anesthetic recovery, with shorter times to achieving sternal recumbency, regaining ambulation and reaching full recovery. Cats in the Dex 1 and Dex 5 groups presented the best recovery quality scores, with 4 (range 4-5) and 4 (range 3-5), respectively, while the Prop group scored 1 (range 1-3), the worst anesthetic recovery score among the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of dexmedetomidine as a total intravenous anesthesia adjuvant, especially at doses of 1 and 3 µg/kg/h, reduces propofol consumption and improves cardiorespiratory stability and intraoperative analgesia, while promoting a better and quicker recovery from anesthesia.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesPropofolAnesthesia, IntravenousAnimalsCatsHysterectomyOvariectomyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAlpha2 adrenergic agonistanalgesiaanesthesiasedation

Identifiers

PMID36409556
PMCPMC10812347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.