Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409435›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2023

A phase 1 open-label study to assess the relative bioavailability of TAK-931 tablets in reference to powder-in-capsule in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Neeltje Steeghs, Melinda Pruis, Carla van Herpen, Vickie Lu, John Redman, Xiaofei Zhou

Open access · hybridFull text readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Drug repurposing for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeltje SteeghsThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Melinda PruisErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carla van HerpenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vickie LuTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA, USA.
John RedmanProteus Ventures LLC, Kennett Square, PA, USA.
Xiaofei ZhouTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA, USA. Xiaofei.Zhou@Takeda.com.
Takeda (United States) · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this phase 1 open-label study, we assessed the relative bioavailability of a prototype tablet formulation of TAK-931, a cell division cycle 7 kinase inhibitor, in reference to the current powder-in-capsule (PIC) formulation in patients with advanced solid tumors for whom no effective standard treatment was available. Adult patients were randomized 1:1 in a crossover fashion to receive one dose of TAK-931 80 mg PIC on Day 1 and one dose of TAK-931 80 mg tablet on Day 3 (or the reverse sequence), followed by TAK-931 50 mg PIC once daily (QD) for 12 days starting from Day 5, before a 7-day rest period (Cycle 0). From Cycle 1, all patients received 50 mg PIC QD on Days 1-14 followed by a 7-day rest period. Twenty patients were enrolled. Median T

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdministration, OralAdultArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesHumansPowdersPyrazolonesPyrimidinesTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyPowdersPyrazolonesPyrimidinessimurosertibTabletsBioavailabilityCDC7 inhibitorPhase 1Solid tumorsTAK-931

Identifiers

PMID36409435
PMCPMC10030390
OpenAlexW4309517097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.