Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Drospirenone 4 mg in a 24 + 4 regimen in women with contraindications to oestrogen use for contraception: bleeding patterns according to previous menstrual characteristics.
Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of different progestins in combined oral contraceptives: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of drospirenone as a progestin-only pill in Japanese women: A phase III study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA new POP consisting of 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) for 24 days with a 4-day hormone-free interval was developed to improve bleeding predictability during POP use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on bleeding patterns during use of this oral contraceptive (OC) in comparison with previous menstrual cycles before the start of OC use.
methodsThis is a pilot, prospective trial. A diary was used to collect information about daily bleeding and pelvic pain before and during treatment. During OC use, women were categorised as having (1) unscheduled bleeding or spotting days (UB), (2) scheduled bleeding or spotting days (SB) and (3) absence of bleeding/spotting (AB). SF-36 and FSFI questionnaires were used to quantify health-related quality of life and the quality of sexual life in sexually active participants.
resultsEighteen out of twenty-five (72%) women completed the entire follow-up. Women with UB (44.4%) were older at inclusion (p < 0.001) and had higher BMIs (p = 0.02) than those with AB (22.2%) or SB (33.4%). Women recorded a significant reduction of menstrual flow intensity during OC use (p < 0.0001). Those with UB also experienced a significant reduction of menstrual pain intensity (p = 0.006). Women with SB during OC use had a longer baseline cycle than those who reported UB during OC use (p = 0.008). Satisfaction with this OC was very high (8.4 ± 2.2 points) with no modification in SF-36 and FSFI values.
conclusionA DRSP-only pill is a good OC option for women with contraindications to oestrogen use. Features of the menstrual cycle before the start of OC use may be used to predict associated changes in bleeding patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.