SynthesisAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2022
[Systematic review on the effectiveness of cognitive multisensory rehabilitation].
Synthesis in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- A case report on the integration of the Monitored Augmented Rehabilitation System in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for a pediatric patient with a ruptured arteriovenous malformation.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- [Rehabilitation and functional capacity in the health of the 21st century].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive multisensory rehabilitation (CMR) -a therapeutic approach to help recover movement using neurocognitive exercises- activates patient's perceptive and cognitive processes, key for motor learning. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of CMR on motor function and quality of life and compare the findings with other rehabilitation approaches or no-intervention in neurological and trauma adult and pediatric patients. We carried out a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials, pilot studies, and case series in PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and the CINHAL Complete database published between 2012 and 2021. Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. CMR provides similar or superior benefits compared to other types of approaches for the restoration of upper limb function, gait, balance, and quality of life in neurological and trauma patients. Further research with larger samples and higher methodological quality need to be developed to de-termine its long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.