Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408471›Full record

ArticleRechtsmedizin (Berlin, Germany)2023

[Violent death in association with the COVID-19 pandemic].

S Keimling, C Babian, J Dreßler

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Rechtsmedizin (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S KeimlingInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Leipzig, Johannisallee 28, Haus H, 04103 Leipzig, Deutschland.
C BabianInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Leipzig, Johannisallee 28, Haus H, 04103 Leipzig, Deutschland.
J DreßlerInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Leipzig, Johannisallee 28, Haus H, 04103 Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, there is talk of excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to examine whether this excess mortality is not only caused by fatal disease progression, but also by violent deaths associated with the pandemic. Material and methods: In a retrospective study, 825 autopsy reports from the Leipzig Institute for Forensic Medicine for the year 2020 were evaluated, including 72 suicides and 14 homicides, which were examined for a connection to the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of the criminal investigations and the statistics on the causes of death from the respective competent authorities for the years 2015-2020 were included.Data were entered anonymously and evaluated descriptively. Results: Overall, 5 of 72 suicides (6.94%) and 1 of 14 homicides (7.14%) were motivated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of suicides in Germany fell overall between 2015 and 2020. Across Germany, there was no significant increase in suicides in 2020, whereas the number of suicides in Saxony rose by 8.7% (not significant) in the first year of the pandemic, 2020. Discussion: In the Saxony sample examined, around 7% of the suicides and homicides were motivated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Motives included travel and exit restrictions, fear of infection with COVID-19 and changes in the social environment caused by the pandemic.The COVID-19-related excess mortality can therefore also be attributed to pandemic-associated violent deaths.It is intent to continue research on data for the second year of the pandemic (2021).

Indexed as

COVID-19Excess mortalityHomicidePandemicSuicide

Identifiers

PMID36408471
PMCPMC9651114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.