Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408404›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Online hard example mining vs. fixed oversampling strategy for segmentation of new multiple sclerosis lesions from longitudinal FLAIR MRI.

Marius Schmidt-Mengin, Théodore Soulier, Mariem Hamzaoui, Arya Yazdan-Panah, Benedetta Bodini, Nicholas Ayache, Bruno Stankoff, Olivier Colliot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marius Schmidt-MenginInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inria, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Théodore SoulierInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Mariem HamzaouiInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Arya Yazdan-PanahInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inria, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Benedetta BodiniInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Nicholas AyacheInria, Epione Project-Team, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Bruno StankoffInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Olivier ColliotInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inria, Inserm, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting new lesions is a key aspect of the radiological follow-up of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), leading to eventual changes in their therapeutics. This paper presents our contribution to the MSSEG-2 MICCAI 2021 challenge. The challenge is focused on the segmentation of new MS lesions using two consecutive Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). In other words, considering longitudinal data composed of two time points as input, the aim is to segment the lesional areas, which are present only in the follow-up scan and not in the baseline. The backbone of our segmentation method is a 3D UNet applied patch-wise to the images, and in which, to take into account both time points, we simply concatenate the baseline and follow-up images along the channel axis before passing them to the 3D UNet. Our key methodological contribution is the use of online hard example mining to address the challenge of class imbalance. Indeed, there are very few voxels belonging to new lesions which makes training deep-learning models difficult. Instead of using handcrafted priors like brain masks or multi-stage methods, we experiment with a novel modification to online hard example mining (OHEM), where we use an exponential moving average (i.e., its weights are updated with momentum) of the 3D UNet to mine hard examples. Using a moving average instead of the raw model should allow smoothing of its predictions and allow it to give more consistent feedback for OHEM.

Indexed as

deep learninghard example miningMRImultiple sclerosissegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36408404
PMCPMC9672803
OpenAlexW4308164703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.