ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Combined brain network topological metrics with machine learning algorithms to identify essential tremor.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential Tremor Severity Assessment Using Handwriting Analysis and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Quantitative Phenotyping of Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement syndrome, and the pathogenesis mechanisms, especially the brain network topological changes in ET are still unclear. The combination of graph theory (GT) analysis with machine learning (ML) algorithms provides a promising way to identify ET from healthy controls (HCs) at the individual level, and further help to reveal the topological pathogenesis in ET. Methods: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were obtained from 101 ET and 105 HCs. The topological properties were analyzed by using GT analysis, and the topological metrics under every single threshold and the area under the curve (AUC) of all thresholds were used as features. Then a Mann-Whitney Results: All classifiers achieved good classification performance. The mean accuracy of Support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and naïve bayes (NB) was 84.65, 85.03, 84.85, and 76.31%, respectively. LR classifier achieved the best classification performance with 85.03% mean accuracy, 83.97% sensitivity, and an AUC of 0.924. Correlation analysis results showed that 2 topological features negatively and 1 positively correlated with tremor severity. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that combining topological metrics with ML algorithms could not only achieve high classification accuracy for discrimination ET from HCs but also help us to reveal the potential topological pathogenesis of ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.