Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The circadian system modulates the cortisol awakening response in humans.

Nicole P Bowles, Saurabh S Thosar, Matthew P Butler, Noal A Clemons, LaTroy D Robinson, Omar H Ordaz, Maya X Herzig, Andrew W McHill, Sean P M Rice, Jonathan Emens and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole P BowlesOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Saurabh S ThosarOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Matthew P ButlerOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Noal A ClemonsOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
LaTroy D RobinsonOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Omar H OrdazOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Maya X HerzigOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Andrew W McHillOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Sean P M RiceOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Jonathan EmensOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Steven A SheaOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute KL2 SupplementKL2TR002370 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine Lee Hough · 2017 to 2026
$10.1M
Endogenous circadian mechanisms underlying cardiovascular riskR35HL155681 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN A SHEA · 2021 to 2026
$5.5M
Androgen receptors and sex differences in the biological clockR01NS102962 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BUTLER, MATTHEW P · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Role of the circadian rhythm on endocannabinoid response to an acute stressK01HL151745 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BOWLES, NICOLE P · 2021 to 2025
$957k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002370NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL151745NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL155681NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In humans, circulating cortisol usually peaks 30-60 min after awakening from nocturnal sleep, this is commonly referred to as the cortisol awakening response (CAR). We examined the extent to which the CAR is influenced by the circadian system, independent of behaviors including sleep. Materials and methods: We examined the CAR in 34 adults (20 female) using two complementary multiday in-laboratory circadian protocols performed in dim light, throughout which behavioral factors were uniformly distributed across the 24-hour circadian cycle. Protocol 1 consisted of 10 identical consecutive 5-hour 20-minute sleep/wake cycles, and protocol 2 consisted of 5 identical consecutive 18-hour sleep/wake cycles. Salivary melatonin was used as the circadian phase marker (0° = dim light melatonin onset). During each sleep/wake cycle, salivary cortisol was measured upon scheduled awakening and 50-minutes later, with the change in cortisol defined as the CAR. Cosinor analyses were used to detect any significant circadian rhythmicity in the CAR. In secondary analyses, we adjusted the models for time awake before lights on, total sleep time, percent of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and percent of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Results: Both protocols revealed a similar circadian rhythm in the CAR, with peaks occurring at a circadian phase corresponding to 3:40-3:45 a.m., with no detectable CAR during the circadian phases corresponding to the afternoon. In addition to the sinusoidal component of the circadian rhythm, total sleep time was also associated with the CAR for protocol 1. The percent of sleep spent in REM or NREM sleep were not associated with the CAR in either protocol. Conclusion: Our results show that the CAR exhibits a robust circadian rhythm that persists even after adjusting for prior sleep. Presuming that the CAR optimizes physiological responses to the anticipated stressors related to awakening, these findings may have implications for shift workers who wake up at unusual circadian phases. A blunted CAR in shift workers upon awakening in the evening may result in diminished responses to stressors.

Indexed as

ACTHawakeningchronic stresscircadiancortisolHPA-axissleeptime of day

Identifiers

PMID36408390
PMCPMC9669756
OpenAlexW4308416535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.