Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408370›Full record

ArticleEmpirical economics2022

Big data forecasting of South African inflation.

Byron Botha, Rulof Burger, Kevin Kotzé, Neil Rankin, Daan Steenkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Empirical economics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Byron BothaCodera Analytics, 42 Ennis Road, Parkview, Gauteng 2193 South Africa.
Rulof BurgerDepartment of Economics, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, 7601 South Africa.
Kevin KotzéPredictive Insights, 3 Meson Street, Techno Park, Stellenbosch, 7600 South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-266X
Neil RankinPredictive Insights, 3 Meson Street, Techno Park, Stellenbosch, 7600 South Africa.
Daan SteenkampCodera Analytics, 42 Ennis Road, Parkview, Gauteng 2193 South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate whether the use of statistical learning techniques and big data can enhance the accuracy of inflation forecasts. We make use of a large dataset for the disaggregated prices of consumption goods and services, which we partially reconstruct, and a large suite of different statistical learning and traditional time-series models. The results suggest that the statistical learning models are able to compete with most benchmarks over medium to longer horizons, despite the fact that we only have a relatively small sample of available data. This may imply that the ability of statistical learning models to explain nonlinear relationships, or as an alternative, restrict the set of predictors to relevant information, is of importance. These characteristics of the statistical learning models may be particularly useful during periods of crisis, when deviations from the steady state are more persistent. We find that the accuracy of the central bank's near-term inflation forecasts compares favourably with those of other models, while the inclusion of off-model information, such as electricity tariff adjustments and other sources of within-month data, provides these models with a competitive advantage. Lastly, we also investigate the relative performance of the different models as we experienced the effects of the recent pandemic and identify the most important contributors to future inflationary pressure. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00181-022-02329-y.

Indexed as

Bayesian methodsHigh-dimensional regressionInflationMicro-dataPenalised likelihoodStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID36408370
PMCPMC9644019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.