Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408299›Full record

ArticleEducational studies in mathematics2023

The transition from school to university in mathematics education research: new trends and ideas from a systematic literature review.

Pietro Di Martino, Francesca Gregorio, Paola Iannone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Educational studies in mathematics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pietro Di MartinoDepartment of Mathematics, Università Di Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 5, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-866X
Francesca GregorioUniversité de Paris, Univ. Paris Est Creteil, CY Cergy Paris Université, Univ. Lille, UNIROUEN, LDAR, F-75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-8898
Paola IannoneDepartment of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7904-5380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the transition between educational levels is one of the main themes for the future of mathematics education. In particular, the transition from secondary school to STEM degrees is problematic for the widespread students' difficulties and significant for the implications that it has on students' futures. Knowing and understanding the past is key to imagine the future of a research field. For this reason, this paper reports a systematic review of the literature on the secondary-tertiary transition in Mathematics Education from 2008 to 2021. We constructed two corpuses: one from the proceedings of three international conferences in mathematics education (PME, ICME, and INDRUM) and the other from peer reviewed research papers and book chapters returned by the databases ERIC and Google Scholar. A clear evolution in perspectives since 2008 emerges from the analysis of the two corpuses: the research focus changed from a purely cognitive to a more holistic one, including socio-cultural and - to a lesser extent - affective issues. To this end, a variety of research methods were used, and specific theoretical models were developed in the considered papers. The analysis also highlights a worrisome trend of underrepresentation: very little research comes from large geographical areas such as South America or Africa. We argue that this gap in representation is problematic as research on secondary tertiary transition concerns also consideration of socio-cultural and contextual factors.

Indexed as

Epistemological affective and socio-cultural approachesRite of passageSecondary-tertiary transitionSystematic literature reviewUndergraduate mathematics students

Identifiers

PMID36408299
PMCPMC9650668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.