Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408125›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022

Single center outcomes of intracranial evaluation and surgical intervention in the elderly population.

Hina Dave, Antonio Guerra, Maria Rodriguez, Irina Podkorytova, Bradley Lega

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hina DaveDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Antonio GuerraDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Maria RodriguezDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Irina PodkorytovaDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Bradley LegaDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The object of this case series is to report the effectiveness and complication rates of presurgical evaluation and surgical treatment among elderly epilepsy patients in our clinic. Methods: We reviewed patients charts from 2016 to 2020 and identified patients over the age of 55 years of age who underwent intracranial EEG, resection, and device placement. We compared the complications and post-intervention outcomes of 14 different patients. Results: The mean age of patients was 63.6 ± 4.13 years, and 6 (42.9 %) patients were female. 8 (57.1 %) patients underwent intracranial evaluation; 6 patients underwent SEEG, and 2 patients underwent SDE placement. 5/11 (45 %) patients reached seizure freedom with at least one year follow-up. Discussion: Intracranial evaluation could play an important role in the success of surgical intervention in the elderly epilepsy population. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to determine the ideal candidate for a safe and effective intracranial evaluation and resection.

Indexed as

ElderlyEpilepsyInterventionIntracranialSurgical

Identifiers

PMID36408125
PMCPMC9672877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.