Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408095›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A bibliometric analysis of global research from 2004 to 2022.

Jinjing Hu, Jihua Zou, Yantong Wan, Qiuru Yao, Peng Dong, Gege Li, Xuan Wu, Lijie Zhang, Donghui Liang, Qing Zeng and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinjing HuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jihua ZouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yantong WanCollege of Anesthesiology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuru YaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng DongSchool of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gege LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuan WuSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lijie ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Donghui LiangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guozhi HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The mortality rate of stroke has been increasing worldwide. Poststroke somatic dysfunctions are common. Motor function rehabilitation of patients with such somatic dysfunctions enhances the quality of life and has long been the primary practice to achieve functional recovery. In this regard, we aimed to delineate the new trends and frontiers in stroke motor function rehabilitation literature published from 2004 to 2022 using a bibliometric software. Methods: All documents related to stroke rehabilitation and published from 2004 to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Publication output, research categories, countries/institutions, authors/cocited authors, journals/cocited journals, cocited references, and keywords were assessed using VOSviewer v.1.6.15.0 and CiteSpace version 5.8. The cocitation map was plotted according to the analysis results to intuitively observe the research hotspots. Results: Overall, 3,302 articles were retrieved from 78 countries or regions and 564 institutions. Over time, the publication outputs increased annually. In terms of national contribution, the United States published the most papers, followed by China, Japan, South Korea, and Canada. Yeungnam University had the most articles among all institutions, followed by Emory University, Fudan University, and National Taiwan University. Jang Sung Ho and Wolf S.L. were the most productive (56 published articles) and influential (cited 1,121 times) authors, respectively. "Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3-9 months after stroke: the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation randomized clinical trial" was the most frequently cited reference. Analysis of keywords showed that upper limbs, Fugl-Meyer assessment, electromyography, virtual reality, telerehabilitation, exoskeleton, and brain-computer interface were the research development trends and focus areas for this topic. Conclusion: Publications regarding motor function rehabilitation following stroke are likely to continuously increase. Research on virtual reality, telemedicine, electroacupuncture, the brain-computer interface, and rehabilitation robots has attracted increasing attention, with these topics becoming the hotspots of present research and the trends of future research.

Indexed as

CiteSpacemotor functionrehabilitationstrokeVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID36408095
PMCPMC9667945
OpenAlexW4308126019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.