Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408077›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022

Geometric characterization of dynamical structure for neural firing activities induced by inhibitory pulse.

Junjie Wang, Jieqiong Xu, Jianmei Wu, Qixiang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junjie WangSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004 China.
Jieqiong XuSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004 China.
Jianmei WuSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004 China.
Qixiang XuSchool of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, inhibitory stimuli are thought to inhibit neuronal firing, but they may actually enhance firing sometimes, such as post-inhibitory rebound spike (PIR spike) and post-inhibitory facilitation (PIF) phenomena, which play an important role in human neuronal activities. We study responses to inhibitory pulse in a classical neuron model (Quartic adaptive Integrate-and-fire model) well known to reproduce a number of biologically realistic behaviors. The three phenomena that we study are PIR, in which a neuron fires after an inhibitory pulse, and PIF, in which a subthreshold excitatory input can induce a spike if it is applied with proper timing after an inhibitory pulse, as well as period firing after inhibitory pulse. When the system features focus and saddle two equilibriums, the three phenomena will be occurred under the inhibitory pulse, while all three phenomena will not be induced when the system features node and saddle two equilibriums. Using dynamical systems theory, we explain the threshold mechanism of enhancement of neural firing response induced by inhibitory pulse and analyze the origin of these phenomena from several factors. We also describe the geometric characterization of dynamical structures of these three phenomena. This study therefore enrich the paradoxical phenomena that induced by inhibitory input and advance our understanding of its role.

Indexed as

Post-inhibitory facilitationPost-inhibitory reboundThreshold curve

Identifiers

PMID36408077
PMCPMC9666638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.