ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2022
Complex spiking neural networks with synaptic time-delay based on anti-interference function.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research on a brain-like model with bio-interpretability is conductive to promoting its information processing ability in the field of artificial intelligence. Biological results show that the synaptic time-delay can improve the information processing abilities of the nervous system, which are an important factor related to the formation of brain cognitive functions. However, the synaptic plasticity with time-delay of a brain-like model still lacks bio-interpretability. In this study, combining excitatory and inhibitory synapses, we construct the complex spiking neural networks (CSNNs) with synaptic time-delay that more conforms biological characteristics, in which the topology has scale-free property and small-world property, and the nodes are represented by an Izhikevich neuron model. Then, the information processing abilities of CSNNs with different types of synaptic time-delay are comparatively evaluated based on the anti-interference function, and the mechanism of this function is discussed. Using two indicators of the anti-interference function and three kinds of noise, our simulation results consistently verify that: (i) From the perspective of anti-interference function, an CSNN with synaptic random time-delay outperforms an CSNN with synaptic fixed time-delay, which in turn outperforms an CSNN with synaptic none time-delay. The results imply that brain-like networks with more bio-interpretable synaptic time-delay have stronger information processing abilities. (ii) The synaptic plasticity is the intrinsic factor of the anti-interference function of CSNNs with different types of synaptic time-delay. (iii) The synaptic random time-delay makes an CSNN present better topological characteristics, which can improve the information processing ability of a brain-like network. It implies that synaptic time-delay is a factor that affects the anti-interference function at the level of performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.