ArticleEmpirical software engineering2023
On the privacy of mental health apps: An empirical investigation and its implications for app development.
Article in Empirical software engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial Requirements for the Prototyping of an App for a Psychosocial Rehabilitation Project: An Integrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Using App Store Reviews to Explore User Experiences and Perceptions of Mental Health Mobile Apps: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Quality and Characteristics of Digital Mental Health Apps: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Safety Envelopes and Continuous Assurance for Updates and Postmarket Surveillance in Digital Mental Health Technologies.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Conducting Behavioural Experiments Using an App-Based Self-Help Program for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMASH): Outcomes of a Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Pilot Trial.Clinical psychology in Europe · 2026Article
- The unintended negative consequences of artificial intelligence use for psychologists.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Facts label for transparent communication of AI Risks in mental health technology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mental health chatbots and their technical features: A systematic review of reviews and a thematic analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- AI-generated documentation of psychiatric interviews: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Five years of app evaluation: Insights from a framework in practice - a systematic review on the m-health index and navigation database.Internet interventions · 2025Article
- Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- From operating room to recovery: Evidence and gaps in cardiac surgical nursing integrative psychological support.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Quality and Privacy Policy Compliance of Mental Health Care Apps in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Telepsychiatry and Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Review of Emerging Approaches to Accessible Psychiatric Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Digital interventions in mental health: An overview and future perspectives.Internet interventions · 2025Review
- Podcasts in Mental, Physical, or Combined Health Interventions for Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Expert and Interdisciplinary Analysis of AI-Driven Chatbots for Mental Health Support: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of the Digital Equity Gap of Apps for Cigarette Smoking Cessation for Persons Living in the Hispanosphere.Current addiction reports · 2024Article
- AI-Assisted Detection of Biomarkers by Sensors and Biosensors for Early Diagnosis and Monitoring.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Exploring How Youth Use TikTok for Mental Health Information in British Columbia: Semistructured Interview Study With Youth.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
An increasing number of mental health services are now offered through mobile health (mHealth) systems, such as in mobile applications (apps). Although there is an unprecedented growth in the adoption of mental health services, partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about data privacy risks due to security breaches are also increasing. Whilst some studies have analyzed mHealth apps from different angles, including security, there is relatively little evidence for data privacy issues that may exist in mHealth apps used for mental health services, whose recipients can be particularly vulnerable. This paper reports an empirical study aimed at systematically identifying and understanding data privacy incorporated in mental health apps. We analyzed 27 top-ranked mental health apps from Google Play Store. Our methodology enabled us to perform an in-depth privacy analysis of the apps, covering static and dynamic analysis, data sharing behaviour, server-side tests, privacy impact assessment requests, and privacy policy evaluation. Furthermore, we mapped the findings to the LINDDUN threat taxonomy, describing how threats manifest on the studied apps. The findings reveal important data privacy issues such as unnecessary permissions, insecure cryptography implementations, and leaks of personal data and credentials in logs and web requests. There is also a high risk of user profiling as the apps' development do not provide foolproof mechanisms against linkability, detectability and identifiability. Data sharing among 3rd-parties and advertisers in the current apps' ecosystem aggravates this situation. Based on the empirical findings of this study, we provide recommendations to be considered by different stakeholders of mHealth apps in general and apps developers in particular. We conclude that while developers ought to be more knowledgeable in considering and addressing privacy issues, users and health professionals can also play a role by demanding privacy-friendly apps. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10664-022-10236-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.