Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407691›Full record

SynthesisSultan Qaboos University medical journal2022

Women's Utilisation, Experiences and Satisfaction with Postnatal Follow-up Care: Systematic literature review.

Amal Al Hadi, Michelle Paliwoda, Jennifer Dawson, Karen Walker, Karen New

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characteristics of house calls in Brazil: analysis of PMAQ-AB external evaluation cycles.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amal Al HadiMidwifery Program, Higher Institute of Health Specialities, Muscat, Oman.
Michelle PaliwodaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jennifer DawsonNewborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Karen WalkerNewborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Karen NewSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postnatal follow-up care is reported to be the 'underutilised' aspect of the maternity care continuum. This review explores women's utilisation of early and late postnatal follow-up and their experiences and satisfaction with it. Five online databases were searched for English or Arabic articles published between 2011 and 2021. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; the Andersen healthcare utilisation model was the framework for data analysis. A total of 19 articles met all inclusion criteria. Utilisation facilitators included complications, travel distance, knowledge of the importance for attending and being offered a telephone call and home visit or clinic visit as options for follow-up. Impediments included lack of perceived need and not being provided with information about postnatal care. Comprehensive discussions with and examination by health providers were reported as positive experiences and influenced repeat utilisation. Dissatisfaction was associated with inconsistent information provided by health providers.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPersonal SatisfactionAftercareFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyLiterature ReviewPostnatal CarePostpartum PeriodWomen

Identifiers

PMID36407691
PMCPMC9645514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.