Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407682›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer.

William N Duggar, Lacey Weatherall, Mary R Nittala, Toms V Thomas, Eswar K Mundra, Jeremy Otts, William C Woods, Claus Yang, Srinivasan Vijayakumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William N DuggarRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Lacey WeatherallRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Mary R NittalaRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Toms V ThomasRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Eswar K MundraRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Jeremy OttsRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
William C WoodsRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Claus YangRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Srinivasan VijayakumarRadiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multiple disciplines both within and outside of oncology. This complexity can lead to longer package times, and each involved discipline has the responsibility to maintain an efficient and effective process. Strategic intervention to improve package time must involve not only new technology or tools, but also "soft" components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership. This combination is necessary to truly optimize radiation therapy for HN cancer, leading to shorter total package times for these patients. Methods and Materials: Two interventions were strategically executed to improve radiation therapy workflow: upgrade of the treatment planning system and implementation of an automated patient management and accountability system. The radiation therapy-related timelines of 112 patients with HN cancer treated over 2 years were reviewed, and the average time differences were compared between the patient populations before and after the strategic interventions. Results: Purely upgrading the treatment planning system did not show significant improvements, but when combined with the patient management system, significant improvement in radiation-related package time can be noted for every time point. The overall reduction of radiation-related package time was statistically significant at 22.85 days ( Conclusions: On face value, the patient management system could be credited as responsible for the improvement, but on qualitative analysis, it is noted that the new system is only a tool that can be ignored or underused. Owing to the addition of important "soft" components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership, the patient management system was optimized and implemented in such a manner as to have the desired effect.

Identifiers

PMID36407682
PMCPMC9667191
OpenAlexW4307399165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.