Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407617›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of collard greens, spinach and chicory production systems in Southeast of Brazil.

Breno de Jesus Pereira, Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho, Newton La Scala, Eduardo Barretto de Figueiredo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Breno de Jesus PereiraCollege of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University - Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Arthur Bernardes Cecílio FilhoCollege of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University - Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Newton La ScalaCollege of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University - Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Barretto de FigueiredoDepartment of Rural Development, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food production in sustainable agricultural systems is one of the main challenges of modern agriculture. Vegetable intercropping may be a strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, replacing monoculture systems. The objective is to identify the main emissions sources and to estimate GHG emissions of intercropping and monoculture production of collard greens, New Zealand spinach and chicory. Four scenarios were evaluated: ICS - intercropping collard greens and spinach; MCS - monoculture collard greens and spinach; ICC - intercropping collard greens and chicory; MCC - monoculture collard greens and chicory. The boundaries' reach from "cradle-to-gate" and the calculation of GHG emissions were performed using IPCC methodology and specific factors (Tier 2). The total GHG emitted was standardized as CO

Indexed as

carbon footprintdirect and indirect emissionsglobal warming potentialintercroppingvegetables

Identifiers

PMID36407617
PMCPMC9667872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.