ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022
A systematic literature review and existing challenges toward fake news detection models.
Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Unmasking digital deceptions: An integrative review of deepfake detection, multimedia forensics, and cybersecurity challenges.MethodsX · 2025Review
- Review
- Normalized effect size (NES): a novel feature selection model for Urdu fake news classification.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging of social media creates inconsistencies in online news, which causes confusion and uncertainty for consumers while making decisions regarding purchases. On the other hand, in existing studies, there is a lack of empirical and systematic examination observed in terms of inconsistency regarding reviews. The spreading of fake news and disinformation on social media platforms has adverse effects on stability and social harmony. Fake news is often emerging and spreading on social media day by day. It results in influencing or annoying and also misleading nations or societies. Several studies aim to recognize fake news from real news on online social media platforms. Accurate and timely detection of fake news prevents the propagation of fake news. This paper aims to conduct a review on fake news detection models that is contributed by a variety of machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The fundamental and well-performing approaches that existed in the past years are reviewed and categorized and described in different datasets. Further, the dataset utilized, simulation platforms, and recorded performance metrics are evaluated as an extended review model. Finally, the survey expedites the research findings and challenges that could have significant implications for the upcoming researchers and professionals to improve the trust worthiness of automated fake news detection models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.