Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407554›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022

A systematic literature review and existing challenges toward fake news detection models.

Minal Nirav Shah, Amit Ganatra

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minal Nirav ShahResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science, CSPIT, CHARUSAT, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa, Gujarat 388421 India.
Amit GanatraProvost, Parul University, P.O.Limda, Ta.Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat 391760 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging of social media creates inconsistencies in online news, which causes confusion and uncertainty for consumers while making decisions regarding purchases. On the other hand, in existing studies, there is a lack of empirical and systematic examination observed in terms of inconsistency regarding reviews. The spreading of fake news and disinformation on social media platforms has adverse effects on stability and social harmony. Fake news is often emerging and spreading on social media day by day. It results in influencing or annoying and also misleading nations or societies. Several studies aim to recognize fake news from real news on online social media platforms. Accurate and timely detection of fake news prevents the propagation of fake news. This paper aims to conduct a review on fake news detection models that is contributed by a variety of machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The fundamental and well-performing approaches that existed in the past years are reviewed and categorized and described in different datasets. Further, the dataset utilized, simulation platforms, and recorded performance metrics are evaluated as an extended review model. Finally, the survey expedites the research findings and challenges that could have significant implications for the upcoming researchers and professionals to improve the trust worthiness of automated fake news detection models.

Indexed as

Dataset utilizedDeep learningFake news detection modelsMachine learningRecorded performance metricsResearch gaps and challengesSimulation platforms

Identifiers

PMID36407554
PMCPMC9663194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.