Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407490›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023

BioXmark® liquid fiducials to enable radiotherapy tumor boosting in rectal cancer, a feasibility trial.

Thirza J S Opbroek, Yves C P Willems, Frank Verhaegen, Rogier de Ridder, Chantal Hoge, Jarno Melenhorst, Frans Bakers, Heike I Grabsch, Jeroen Buijsen, Evert J Van Limbergen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thirza J S OpbroekDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Yves C P WillemsDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Frank VerhaegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Rogier de RidderDepartment of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Chantal HogeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Jarno MelenhorstDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Frans BakersDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Jeroen BuijsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Evert J Van LimbergenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Richard A M CantersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Maaike BerbéeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
Maastro Clinic · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dose-escalation in rectal cancer (RCa) may result in an increased complete response rate and thereby enable omission of surgery and organ preservation. In order to implement dose-escalation, it is crucial to develop a technique that allows for accurate image-guided radiotherapy. The aim of the current study was to determine the performance of a novel liquid fiducial marker (BioXmark®) in RCa patients during the radiotherapy course by assessing its positional stability on daily cone-beam CT (CBCT), technical feasibility, visibility on different imaging modalities and safety. Materials and methods: Prospective, non-randomized, single-arm feasibility trial with inclusion of twenty patients referred for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced RCa. Primary study endpoint was positional stability on CBCT. Furthermore, technical aspects, safety and clinical performance of the marker, such as visibility on different imaging modalities, were evaluated. Results: Seventy-four markers from twenty patients were available for analysis. The marker was stable in 96% of the cases. One marker showed clinically relevant migration, one marker was lost before start of treatment and one marker was lost during treatment. Marker visibility was good on computed tomography (CT) and CBCT, and moderate on electronic portal imaging ( Conclusion: The novel liquid fiducial marker demonstrated positional stability. We provide evidence of the feasibility of the novel fiducial marker for image-guided radiotherapy on daily cone beam CT for RCa patients.

Indexed as

IGRTLiquid fiducial markerRadiotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36407490
PMCPMC9668658
OpenAlexW4308066191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.