Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon combined with cutting balloon for side branch of true coronary bifurcation lesions: Study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Haoyu Wu, Jizhao Deng, Lei Liang, Xinjun Lei, Xiaowei Yao, Wenqi Han, Haichao Chen, Xiling Shou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haoyu WuDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jizhao DengDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lei LiangDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xinjun LeiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaowei YaoDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Wenqi HanDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Haichao ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xiling ShouDepartment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions are common of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and the optimal interventional therapy strategy is still a matter of debate and remains a challenge for interventional cardiologists. The provisional stenting technique is still a preferred method for most bifurcation lesions, but restenosis of the side branch (SB) occurs in approximately 17-19% of cases. Therefore, the dilemma of reducing SB restenosis still exists, and further research on strategies to reduce restenosis for SB is necessary. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce clinical events in small vessel disease and in-stent restenosis. The efficacy and safety of DCB for SB of true coronary bifurcation lesions have not been fully investigated. A randomized comparison of DCB combined with cutting balloon angioplasty vs. cutting balloon angioplasty for SB has never been published. Methods and design: The purpose of this study is to explore the superiority of DCB combined with cutting balloon vs. cutting balloon angioplasty for SB after main vessel (MV) drug-eluting stent implantation of true coronary bifurcation lesions. This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial including 140 patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either DCB combined with cutting balloon or cutting balloon angioplasty for SB after MV drug-eluting stent implantation. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of late lumen loss (LLL) of SB at the 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints include procedural success during initial hospitalization, LLL of MV at the 9-month follow-up, binary angiographic restenosis in MV and SB at the 9-month follow-up, the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI quantitative flow ratio result ≤ 0.80 for SB at the 9-month follow-up, and major adverse cardiac events during the 24-month follow-up. Conclusions: This clinical trial will provide evidence as to whether DCB combined with cutting balloon for SB of true coronary bifurcation lesions is a superior treatment approach. Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2000040475. Dissemination: The results of this clinical trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

clinical trialcoronary bifurcation lesioncutting balloondrug-coated balloonpercutaneous coronary interventionside branch

Identifiers

PMID36407430
PMCPMC9669449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.