Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407389›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2022

Preferred mode of childbirth among women attending antenatal clinic at a tertiary hospital in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.

Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Evelyn Tamma, Joseph Seffah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Editorial.African health sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kwame Adu-BonsaffohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
Evelyn TammaHoly Care Specialist Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Joseph SeffahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The preference for mode of childbirth by women is emerging as a global subject of interest to many researchers, especially with the steady increase in caesarean section (CS) rates with some countries exceeding the world health organization (WHO) recommended rate. This study explored the preferences of mode of childbirth and associated factors among pregnant women in Ghana. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women at tertiary hospital in Ghana. Descriptive analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results: Among the 415 pregnant women included, 357(86.0%) and 58(14.0%) preferred vaginal delivery and CS respectively. Majority (26%) attributed their preference for vaginal delivery to its being the natural way of childbirth. The most common reason why women preferred to deliver by CS was mainly influenced by medical indication such as doctors' remarks. Significant determinants influencing preference for CS were previous childbirth [aOR:0.21, 95%CI (0.05, 0.91)], previous caesarean [aOR:20.08, 95%CI (7.73, 52.19)] and urban settlement [aOR:2.51, 95%CI (1.01, 6.29)]. Conclusion: There was a clear preference for vaginal birth by pregnant women although a significant proportion preferred caesarean birth. Integration of women's preferred mode of childbirth into the clinical decision with appropriate counselling is recommended to improve women's pregnancy and childbirth experiences.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionParturitionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGhanaHumansPregnancyTertiary Care CentersCaesarean sectionmode of childbirthVaginal Delivery

Identifiers

PMID36407389
PMCPMC9652646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.