ArticleAfrican health sciences2022
Crude extracts activity of three selected medicinal plants from the Venda region against some pathogenic organisms.
Article in African health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemistry and insecticidal activity of six local plant extracts against Sitotroga Cerealella (Oliv.) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in stored wheat.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Investigating the antimicrobial and anticancer potential of culturable fungal endophytes isolated from the stems of Kirkia acuminata Oliv.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- The In Vitro Pharmacokinetics of Medicinal Plants: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Extracellular Enzymatic Activities of Culturable Endophytic Fungi Isolated from the Leaves ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Cholera Outbreaks in Zimbabwe: An In-Depth Analysis of Drivers, Constraints and Reimagining the Use of Medicinal Plants.Journal of tropical medicine · 2024Review
- Editorial.African health sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emerging of antimicrobial resistance has become a problem as it is threatening public health worldwide. Objectives: To extract crude extracts from three different medicinal plants, test activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and screen for phytochemicals of those that showed activity against the targeted bacteria. Methods: KirkiaacuminataOliv., Dichrostachyscinerea (L.) Wight &Arn. and MimusopszeyheriSond. plants were collected at Thengwe area, Mafukani village, Limpopo Province, South Africa. The plant materials collected were extracted using four solvents. Antimicrobial screening was accomplished using the agar well diffusion method and the crude extracts that showed activity against the targeted organisms were screened for phytochemicals using different tests. Results: With all solvents used for extraction, methanol had a greater yield of 14.1% from Dichrostachyscinerea crude extracts. Kirkiaacuminata and Dichrostachyscinerea were medicinal plants that inhibited Mycobacterium smegmatis and Staphylococcus aureus at the lowest concentration of 2.5 mg/ml and 1.25 mg/ml. Conclusions: The results from this study show that the selected medicinal plants are active against Mycobacterium smegmatis and Staphylococcus aureus and their pharmacological properties can be further analyzed for the development of new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.