ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
The hypoglycaemia error grid: A UK-wide consensus on CGM accuracy assessment in hyperinsulinism.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with inherited metabolic disorders at risk for Hypoglycemia and Nutritional implications.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia reduces hypoglycaemia and glycaemic variability.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023Trial
- Utility of continuous glucose monitoring during pancreatic surgery in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Congenital Hyperinsulinism: A National User-satisfaction Survey, UK.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Expanding the horizon of continuous glucose monitoring into the future of pediatric medicine.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Approach to the Neonate With Hypoglycemia.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- The Need for a Modern Error Grid for Clinical Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors and Continuous Glucose Monitors.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Possible Aid for Detecting Hypoglycemic Events during Insulin Tolerance Tests.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bridging the gaps: recent advances in diagnosis, care, and outcomes in congenital hyperinsulinism.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Standardised practices in the networked management of congenital hyperinsulinism: a UK national collaborative consensus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Continuous glucose monitoring for children with hypoglycaemia: Evidence in 2023.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Accuracy and impact on quality of life of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- The hypoglycaemia error grid: A UK-wide consensus on CGM accuracy assessment in hyperinsulinism.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- HYPO-CHEAT's aggregated weekly visualisations of risk reduce real world hypoglycaemia.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) is gaining in popularity for patients with paediatric hypoglycaemia disorders such as Congenital Hyperinsulinism (CHI), but no standard measures of accuracy or associated clinical risk are available. The small number of prior assessments of CGM accuracy in CHI have thus been incomplete. We aimed to develop a novel Hypoglycaemia Error Grid (HEG) for CGM assessment for those with CHI based on expert consensus opinion applied to a large paired (CGM/blood glucose) dataset. Design and methods: Paediatric endocrinology consultants regularly managing CHI in the two UK centres of excellence were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding glucose cutoffs and associated anticipated risks of CGM errors in a hypothetical model. Collated information was utilised to mathematically generate the HEG which was then approved by expert, consensus opinion. Ten patients with CHI underwent 12 weeks of monitoring with a Dexcom G6 CGM and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) with a Contour Next One glucometer to test application of the HEG and provide an assessment of accuracy for those with CHI. Results: CGM performance was suboptimal, based on 1441 paired values of CGM and SMBG showing Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of 19.3% and hypoglycaemia (glucose <3.5mmol/L (63mg/dL)) sensitivity of only 45%. The HEG provided clinical context to CGM errors with 15% classified as moderate risk by expert consensus when data was restricted to that of practical use. This provides a contrasting risk profile from existing diabetes error grids, reinforcing its utility in the clinical assessment of CGM accuracy in hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: The Hypoglycaemia Error Grid, based on UK expert consensus opinion has demonstrated inadequate accuracy of CGM to recommend as a standalone tool for routine clinical use. However, suboptimal accuracy of CGM relative to SMBG does not detract from alternative uses of CGM in this patient group, such as use as a digital phenotyping tool. The HEG is freely available on GitHub for use by other researchers to assess accuracy in their patient populations and validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.