Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407264›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

The Predictive Score for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in Resource-Limited Settings.

Chepsy Philip, Alice David, S K Mathew, Sanjo Sunny, Vijaya Kumar K, Linda Jacob, Luke Mathew, Suresh Kumar, George Chandy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chepsy PhilipClinical Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, COVID-19 Research Group, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Alice DavidMedical Research, COVID-19 Research Group, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
S K MathewInternal Medicine, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Sanjo SunnyIntensive Care Unit, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Vijaya Kumar KInternal Medicine, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Linda JacobPharmacology and Therapeutics, COVID-19 Registry Group, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Luke MathewPulmonary Medicine, COVID-19 Registry Group, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Suresh KumarPediatric Cardiology, COVID-19 Research Group, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
George ChandyGastroenterology and Hepatology, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, IND.
Churchill Hospital · GBNvidia (United Kingdom) · GBMedical Research Foundation · GBThird Hospital of Changsha · CNThiruvalluvar University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims The second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been devastating in India and many developing countries. The mortality reported has been 40% higher than in the first wave, overwhelming the nation's health infrastructure. Despite a better understanding of the disease and established treatment protocols including steroids and heparin, the second wave was disastrous. Subsequent waves have the potential to further cripple healthcare deliveries, also affecting non-COVID-19 care across many developing economies. It is then important to identify and triage high-risk patients to best use the limited resources. Routine tests such as neutrophil and monocyte counts have been identified but have not been successfully validated uniformly, and their utility is still being understood in COVID-19. Various predictive models that are available require online resources and calculators and additionally await validation across all populations. These, although useful, might not be available or accessible across all institutions. It is then important to identify easy-to-use scores that utilize tests done routinely. In identifying with this goal, we did a retrospective review of the institutional database to identify potential predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality in patients hospitalized during the second wave who accessed healthcare at our academic setup. Results Three predictors of mortality and four predictors of ICU admission were identified. Absolute neutrophil count was a common predictor of both ICU admission and mortality but with two separate cut points. An absolute neutrophil count of >4,200 predicted need for ICU admission (odds ratio (OR): 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0, 4.8)), and >7,200 predicted mortality (adjusted OR: 4.2 (95% CI: 1.9, 9.4)). We observed that a blood urea level greater than 45 was predictive of needing ICU care (adjusted OR: 8.0 (95% CI: 3.7, 17.6)). In our dataset, serum ferritin of >500 was predictive of ICU admission (adjusted OR: 2.7 (95% CI: 1.2, 5.9)). We noted a right shift of partial pressure (p50 is the oxygen tension at which hemoglobin is 50% saturated) (p50c) in SARS-CoV-2 as a predictor of ICU care (OR: 2.6 (95% CI: 1.7, 3.9)) when partial pressure is >26.5. In our analysis, a serum protein of less than 7 g/dL (OR: 2.8 (95% CI: 1.7, 4.4)) was a predictive variable for ICU admission. An LDH value of >675 was predictive of severity with a need for ICU admission (OR: 9.2 (95% CI: 5.4, 15.5)) in our series. We then assigned a score to each of the predictive variables based on the adjusted odds ratio. Conclusion We identified a set of easy-to-use predictive variables and scores to recognize the subset of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with the highest risk of death or clinical worsening requiring ICU care.

Indexed as

covid-19covid-19 retrodisease mortalityicu admissionsrisk calculatorsscores

Identifiers

PMID36407264
PMCPMC9671202
OpenAlexW4306398581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.