Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407200›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Effects of Aerobic Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training on V̇O2max and Blood Pressure.

Jean Tamayo Acosta, Ariel E Sosa Gomez, Steven Samuel, Stephanie Pelenyi, Rachel E Acosta, Marjorie Acosta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of exercise during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean Tamayo AcostaMedicine, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bayamón, PRI.
Ariel E Sosa GomezMedical Student, Saint James School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Steven SamuelMedical Student, Saint James School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Stephanie PelenyiMedical Student, Avalon School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Rachel E AcostaResearch, Saint James School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Marjorie AcostaPsychiatry, Hospital Pavia Hato Rey, Bayamón, PRI.
Product Innovation and Engineering (United States) · USAvalon University School of Medicine · CWUniversity of Puerto Rico at Bayamón · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, more than 20% of the world's population suffers from hypertension, a major risk factor for heart disease. Therefore, lifestyle modifications such as dietary change, smoking cessation, and exercise are often prescribed to hypertensive patients as a first-line treatment. This study aims to examine and compare the effects of different exercise regimens on the cardiovascular system, particularly that of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and lower-to-moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (aka aerobic exercise).  After researching various databases and extracting 4,724 studies, 196 were viable within the exclusion criteria related to exercise's effects on blood pressure and maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O

Indexed as

aerobic exercisediastolic blood pressureexercise trainingheart rateheart rate peakhigh intensity interval trainingmaximun oxygen uptakepeak power outputsystolic blood pressurev̇o2max

Identifiers

PMID36407200
PMCPMC9661924
OpenAlexW4306293644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.