ArticleCureus2022
Primary Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of the reporting of extrarenal manifestations in observational studies of Saudi patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Primary care rheumatology: towards sustainable development in health.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The study aims to evaluate the primary healthcare practitioner's (PHCP) knowledge, attitude, and practice toward systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore the difficulties of early referral to specialized clinics. Method This is a cross-sectional study conducted between February and March 2022 targeting the PHCP among the primary healthcare centers in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted among 203 participants who enrolled via a cluster random sampling technique depending on the survey. Qualitative categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables are reported as means and standard deviations (SD). The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and the independent T-test have been used to explore the relationship between participants' knowledge scores and their socio-demographic characteristics. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result The study found that only 4.4% of participating PHCPs had good knowledge related to SLE, while 45.8% of them had fair knowledge, and nearly half of them (49.8%) had poor knowledge. It was noted that GPs who specialized in family medicine or saw more than 40 patients each week had comparably better knowledge than others, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The difficulty in diagnosing SLE patients was mentioned by 48.3% of the PHCPs. Family medicine consultants (p<0.001), those who worked in a tertiary care facility for more than six months (p<0.001) and those who worked in a rheumatology department (p<0.05), reported considerably better levels of comfort when treating SLE patients. Conclusion This study found that included participants' understanding of SLE, its diagnosis, and management was inadequate. Coordination between rheumatologists and experts from many disciplines at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of care is critical for overcoming ambiguities and obstacles in the diagnosis and therapy of SLE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.