Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407123›Full record

ReviewSocial and personality psychology compass2022

The promises and pitfalls of functional magnetic resonance imaging hyperscanning for social interaction research.

Lily Tsoi, Shannon M Burns, Emily B Falk, Diana I Tamir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social and personality psychology compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From behavioral synchrony to language and beyond.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lily TsoiSchool of Psychology and Counseling Caldwell University Caldwell New Jersey USA.
Shannon M BurnsDepartment of Psychological Science Pomona College Claremont California USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Diana I TamirDepartment of Psychology Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-4820

Funding

The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting naturalistic dyadic social interactionsR21MH127284 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TAMIR, DIANA · 2022 to 2023
$446k
Cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting naturalistic dyadic social interactionsF32MH120951 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TSOI, LILY · 2019 to 2021
$192k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH120951NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH127284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social neuroscience combines tools and perspectives from social psychology and neuroscience to understand how people interact with their social world. Here we discuss a relatively new method-hyperscanning-to study real-time, interactive social interactions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We highlight three contributions that fMRI hyperscanning makes to the study of the social mind: (1) Naturalism: it shifts the focus from tightly-controlled stimuli to more naturalistic social interactions; (2) Multi-person Dynamics: it shifts the focus from individuals as the unit of analysis to dyads and groups; and (3) Neural Resolution: fMRI hyperscanning captures high-resolution neural patterns and dynamics across the whole brain, unlike other neuroimaging hyperscanning methods (e.g., electroencephalogram, functional near-infrared spectroscopy). Finally, we describe the practical considerations and challenges that fMRI hyperscanning researchers must navigate. We hope researchers will harness this powerful new paradigm to address pressing questions in today's society.

Indexed as

hyperscanningnaturalistic stimulineuroscience methodssocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID36407123
PMCPMC9667901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.