ArticleOcean & coastal management2023
Multi-resource collaborative scheduling problem of automated terminal considering the AGV charging effect under COVID-19.
Article in Ocean & coastal management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the COVID-19 ravaged the global terminals, the Automated Container Terminal (ACT) has become one of important approach to promote the stronger quick response capacity to deal with the uncertainty that COVID-19 brought to the terminal. This research takes Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) and their effects into account the multi-resource collaborative scheduling model to tradeoff ACT operational efficiency and energy savings. Firstly, the dual-cycle strategy of QC and the pooling strategy of AGV are given, which coordinates the scheduling of Quay Cranes (QCs), Yard Cranes (YCs) and other equipment. Furthermore, a multi-resource collaborative scheduling optimization model is proposed which roots from the principle of the Blocking-type Hybrid Flow Shop Problem (B-HFSP) with the objectives of minimizing the makespan of QC and the transportation energy consumption. And simultaneously, a mixed algorithm SA-GA is designed for solving this mixed integer programming model by an optimizing effect of Simulated Annealing on Genetic algorithms. Numerical experiments show that the model in this research is effective. The convergence of SA-GA is effective for small-scale cases and superior for large-scale cases. Considering both goals of high efficiency and energy saving, the Pareto solution set and collaborative scheduling solution take a priority to ensure that the bottlenecked QC runs efficiently. Here and now the average idle rate of QC is about [14%, 35%] lower than that of other equipment. The collaborative scheduling model constructed above not only has reference value for other multi-device and multi-stage scheduling problem, but also enhance the integrated decision-making ability of the ACT in the post-epidemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.