Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407104›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Helia Hosseini, Christina DeBenedetto, Sriram V Eleswarapu, Gladys Ng, Renea M Sturm

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helia HosseiniDepartment of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Christina DeBenedettoDepartment of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sriram V EleswarapuDepartment of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Gladys NgDepartment of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Renea M SturmDepartment of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
La Jolla Bioengineering Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USMattel Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, reproductive science has revolutionized the options for biological parenthood for the 20-50% of infertility cases affected by male factors. However, current solutions exclude those who are infertile due to absent testicular tissue. This includes anorchic 46, XY individuals due to trauma or congenital factors and transgender men with a 46, XX genotype. There is a clinical need for methods to restore testicular function independent of pre-existing testicular tissue. This mini-review analyzes studies that have applied non-testicular cell lines to generate germline and non-germline testicular parenchymal components. While only 46, XY cell lines have been evaluated in this context to date, the potential for future application of cell lines from 46, XX individuals is also included. Additionally, the role of varied culture methods, media supplementation, and biologic and synthetic scaffolds to further support testicular parenchyma generation are critiqued.

Indexed as

disorders in sex differentiationfertiltygender affirmation treatmentgermline cellsmale infertilitysomatic stem cells (SSCs)tissue engineering and regenerative medicinetissue engineering scaffold materials

Identifiers

PMID36407104
PMCPMC9667054
OpenAlexW4308126607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.